The Chicago Academy of Sciences
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 360895575
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7737555100
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Science and Technology Museums
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,450,790
- Expenses
- $7,790,493
- Assets
- $21,664,652
- Liabilities
- $4,260,307
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
62 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIN AMICO (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ERIN AMICO (PRESIDENT & CEO): $263,049 total reported compensation
- SARA PERSKY (VP OF MARKETING & RETAIL STRATEGY): $172,173 total reported compensation
- CHADWIN COKER (VP OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION): $135,822 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of cas/pnnm is to create a positive relationship between people and nature through collaborations, education, research and collections, exhibits and public forums that foster urban connections to our region's nature and science.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education: educational programs are at the heart of the nature museum's efforts to fulfill its mission. With research and study at the core of the institution's founding, nature museum educators provide more hands-on contact hours with students and teachers than any other museum in the city: more than 78,000 hours each year, with ten full-time school program staff members who teach a combined total of more than 38,000 students and 1,200 teachers from schools throughout chicago, most of which serve high percentages of low-income students primarily from chicago public schools. Students learn about the natural environment and how it directly impacts their lives. These hands-on school programs are aligned with the next generation science standards (ngss), and feature the naturemuseum's unique resources: from live animals to our vast preserved scientific collection. In partnership with depaul university's user experience design capstone class of 2025, the nature museum's sustainability center underwent an incredible digital transformation. Over the course of 13 weeks, the students worked together to develop these games, receiving feedback from museum staff throughout the entire process. The result of their efforts were completely redesigned screens for each of the 5 digital components in the exhibit: water, economy & culture, energy, food, and the library. The finished screens make the content more accessible and engaging for all audiences, while still educating our visitors on the importance of conservation in each pillar.education programs and curriculum grew and expanded over the past year. We piloted new day-off camps and a program specially for tweens (ages 10-14 years old). Summer camp added another group of students to each session, bringing the joy of a summer connecting with nature to more kids, as well as increasing revenue opportunities. Education staff created 3 new science on the go curriculum, grounded in next generation science standards, to bring to teachers and classrooms next school year, building on our 30-year science on the go tradition. We partnered with the lawndale pop-up museum to bring nature connections to their friday evening community events, and the resulting nature-inspired, community-created art work will be showcased at the museum in the fall.through our school partnership programs, nature museum educators are able to reach students from across the city and provide them with high quality, educational lessons that are centered around our mission to help create connections to nature. Science on the go, a teacher professional development program, served 153 classrooms in the 2024-2025 school year. This meant that approximately 5,000 students and 153 teachers received a science and nature based educational program that was designed to help deepen their connection with the environment, and, for teachers, strengthen their confidence and comfortability with teaching science subjects.through in- and out-of-school time opportunities throughout chicago, museum educators make a lasting impact through whole-child learning approaches that build knowledge, skills, interest, and enthusiasm for stem topics. Education programs are founded in a student-driven and inquiry-based approach to connect our audiences to interdisciplinary nature and science phenomena. Fiscal year 2025 student programs included: 634 field trip workshops (at pnnm), 427 summer campers, 89 winter campers, 89 nature on the go (in communities) workshops, 8 after school science club schools, 4 overnight events. Fiscal year 2025 multi-touchpoint school partnerships with teacher professional development programs included: 153 science on the go classrooms, 3 whole school science partnership schools, 34 urban nature partnership classrooms, and 32 science teachingnetwork teachers. Fiscal year 2025 teens & young adults programs included: 1 quarter-long course environmental education theory and practice for depaul university undergraduates, and 25 seasona
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.78; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 54 of 54 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $263K · 62 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $107K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.