The Chas Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460761549
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Norfolk, VA, USA
Phone
7574892427
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Association

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$141,748
Expenses
$123,966
Assets
$87,999
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARGARET CORPREW (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • BEAU KIRKWOOD (EXECUTIVE DI): $45,867 total reported compensation
  • MARGARET CORPREW (PRESIDENT): $41,321 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the chas foundation is: to advocate for individuals living with mental illness; to address the stigma associated with people living with a mental illness; to streamline access to effective treatment; to save the lives of those struggling with a mental illness by working with private and public professionals; to provide education and support for family members impacted by their loved ones mental illness. Established in 2012, the chas foundation aims to streamline access to effective treatment for those impacted by mental illness in the hampton roads region. Chas stands for courage, hope, acceptance, and support. The organization was created in memory of charles h. Kirkwood (chas) who struggled with bipolar disorder, encountered numerous barriers to treatment, and ultimately lost his life to suicide. The organization began as a grassroots movement to significantly change how mental illness is both perceived and treated within our communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mental illness navigator & support (mins) program in 2024, the chas foundation continued helping individuals and their families struggling with mental illness by connecting them to local treatment providers and offering peer family support. Support services include transportation, crisis meals, and temporary housing for individuals with serious mental illness (smi). Indeed, there is a disconnect between an individual needing mental health treatment and them accessing treatment. A multitude of barriers exist accessing treatment including cost, transportation, lack of providers, wait-times to receive treatment, substance abuse, etc chas seeks to eliminate those barriers. The mental illness navigator and support program educates families about the complex mental healthcare system, supports them along their journey, and provides a continuum of care through referrals and connections to local mental health services (treatment providers, housing, police, court, jails). When inpatient and outpatient services and resources are inadequate, or the individual and/or family has exhausted all options, the chas foundation continues to provide peer family support so that a support system is established for the entire family unit. Additional support is given by meeting with individuals and families at their choice of location, providing transportation to reach service providers, and assistance making doctors appointments. The mental health system can be a maze for individuals. Many people, families, and caretakers do not know where to start or how to navigate the system. An online mental health resource guide showing resources and services in every hampton roads city is continually updated for community use. Chas is the primary contact listed for residents to access resources and services on the mentally healthy hampton roads resource guide. The resource guide can be found and downloaded at talkaboutitnorfolk.com. Chas and the navigator and support program provide a free local mental health resource for the hampton roads region. A person can call and speak with a peer-specialist that's compassionate, caring, supportive, and informative while working to increase access to mental health care for that individual, family member, or caretaker. A chas peer-family-support specialist is available by phone from 9am to 5pm monday through friday and no appointment is necessary. The support specialist is local to the region and provides both information and support that is truly a lifeline to callers and program participants. The mins peer-support-specialist can be on the phone or meeting with a program participant for upwards of 3 hours per day. Mins staff work with some program participants daily or multiple times per week and some participants have been in the mins program for over 8 years. Unlike before, local health care and insurance providers are now referring families to the chas foundation. The mins program also receives calls from people asking for information about mental health services and resources including basic information like phone numbers or addresses for inpatient and outpatient treatment providers. In 2024, 612 peer-support connections to service providers and resources were made by the mins program. 58% of the calls chas receives comes from family members or friends asking how to help a loved one. 80% of callers have some form of health insurance. 70% of callers live in south hampton roads. Since the program began, the mins program has directly helped over 4200 people and have made over 5500 connections to local services. 2024 saw an increased demand for support services including crisis meals (69% increase) and temporary housing (282% increase) for individuals with serious mental illness. Mindfulness program mindfulness-based cognitive therapy may be useful for treating symptoms of anxiety, according to research published recently in the british journal of psychiatry. Researchers looked at changes in anxiety levels among patients w

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $118K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $46K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.