The Charleston Parks Conservancy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208375561
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Charleston, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8437245003
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Garden Club, Horticultural Program
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,111,425
- Expenses
- $2,852,160
- Assets
- $9,014,700
- Liabilities
- $481,322
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Darlene Heater (Executive Director (former))
- Jessica Gibadlo (Interim Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Darlene Heater (Executive Director (former)): $229,974 total reported compensation
- Jessica Gibadlo (Interim Executive Director): $34,615 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To cultivate exceptional public gardens and experiences in Charleston's city parks.We do this by delivering meaningful and sustainable: Garden Experiences, Community Events Volunteer, and EngagementVision: Our stewardship of Charleston's city parks builds pride and enjoyment for all.Core Values: - Steward excellence in garden experiences, community events and volunteer engagement.- Lead with creativity and innovation to deliver a distinct standard.- Respect historical context while stewarding parks for future generations.- Ensure long-term organizational sustainability.- Commit to horticulture resiliency.
What it reported doing in 2025
GARDEN EXPERIENCES: The Charleston Parks Conservancy brings its mission to life through Garden Experiences, catalyzing horticulture and gardening for connection, learning, stewardship, and community. Through Garden in the Parks and Gather & Garden, volunteers and residents actively engage in caring for, growing in, and learning in Charleston's city parks. Our Food Forests connect productive landscapes with food access, education, and ecological health. Horticultural Renovations continually renew and enhance our parks and gardens portfolio through thoughtful, resilient, environment and ecology-based design and management.(Continued on Schedule O) Together, these efforts create beautiful, welcoming, and dynamic public landscapes while empowering the community to actively participate in their care and experience the many ways gardens enrich our city and people. Events and educational activations within these spaces only further emphasize and showcase their importance, impact, and opportunities for engagement and connection. In 2025 partnering with the City of Charleston and the community we renovated Colonial Lake, one of Charleston's most precious public parks. For 2026 and and 2027 we are actively planning for and well start renovations at Hazel Parker Playground and Allan Park. VOLUNTEER ENGAGEMENT: The Charleston Parks Conservancy engages volunteers across the 26 parks we operate through meaningful, hands-on experiences in horticulture, community events, and other park stewardship activities. Our Conservancy Stewards are recurring, consistent volunteers who engage with us on a weekly or monthly basis, while external volunteers, including corporate and community groups, typically participate through one-time service opportunities. Together, our volunteers contribute countless hours alongside our staff each year, helping care for our parks, support community events, and strengthen the Conservancy's connection with the communities we serve.EVENTS: The Charleston Parks Conservancy hosts a variety of community, educational, and fundraising events throughout the year that create opportunities for people to experience, enjoy, and connect with Charleston's city parks. Community events activate park spaces, foster connection, and build pride and enjoyment, while fundraising events generate financial support for the Conservancy's stewardship, programming, and ongoing improvement of public parks. Collectively, the events program supports the Conservancy's mission to cultivate exceptional public gardens and experiences in Charleston's city parks.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -35.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $230K · 19 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.