The Charity Pro's Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841764155
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Fort Myers, FL, USA
Phone
2629455057
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,009,453
Expenses
$210,200
Assets
$2,406,206
Liabilities
$553,777

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEGAN MALONEY (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MEGAN MALONEY (PRESIDENT): $32,802 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The charity pros come together to advocate for childrens social causes and expand the opportunities for the children to live their best life. Our dedication and commitment to children is what drives the charity pros to continue to grow and expand. Its our promise to bring all the joy and happiness we can to these brave young hearts through our fundraising efforts, cause programs and support provided to our partnering childrens charities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our purpose is to advocate and support childrens cause programs for health, child protection, poverty, education and equality. The specific objectives and purpose of this organization shall be: a. To partner with community events and fundraiser activities such as concerts, festivals, home shows and other activities that support our cause. B. To partner with other non-profit organizations to help with volunteer work and some of their programs related to our cause. C. To sponsor, host and/or participate in events and activities that support our advocacy causes. D. To align corporate partnerships for donations and cause marketing opportunities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.7%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $188.27 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 89.5%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.45; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 78.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 139.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.7% of revenue deployed · 83.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $176K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $33K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.