The Center for the Partially Sighted

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953771974
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Culver City, CA, USA
Phone
3109881970
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,968,369
Expenses
$2,287,028
Assets
$627,213
Liabilities
$1,073,423

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LADONNA RINGERING PHD (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • PHYLLIS AMARAL (CLINIC SERVICES): $109,016 total reported compensation
  • LADONNA RINGERING PHD (President & CEO): $83,658 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to help visually impaired people of all ages lead independent and satisfying lives. We do this by enhancing their remaining sight and providing emotional support and independent living strategies.

What it reported doing in 2014

The Center for the Partially Sighted helps visually impaired people of all ages lead independent and satisfying lives. We do this by enhancing their remaining sight and providing emotional support and independent living strategies. We offer optometric care, the latest in computer and assistive technology, individual and group counseling sessions, independent living skills training, a low vision store, and a variety of psychosocial services including information and referral, case management and family support.To reach more people throughout Los Angeles County, we have offices in Tarzana, Eagle Rock, Torrance and Culver City. Each year, we serve 2,100 individuals ages 3 months and upwards. No one is turned away because of lack of finances and services are available in English and Spanish.The Center for the Partially Sighted remains a leader in low vision education. We have expanded our internship program to include Occupational Therapy, Social Work interns, and rehabilitation training. We continue to be a primary training site for interns in their final year at the Southern California College of Optometry and we maintain full accreditation by the American Optometric Association for our Low Vision Optometric Residency Program. Recently, we re-introduced our continuing education program for optometrists. It has become one of our most popular education and outreach efforts.We have partnered with the Los Angeles American Diabetes Association and the California Optometric Association to educate people with diabetes and provide them with free vision services. CentraSight, manufacturers of the Implantable Miniature Telescope (IMT), has named us a "Center of Excellence" and enlisted us to assist in evaluating and training candidates for the IMT. We are also partners with Indiana University in a 5-year NEI sponsored grant to research street-crossing decision making in people who are visually impaired. This research will in shape interventions to train visually impaired individuals to travel more safely within their communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.71; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $109K · 15 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.