The Center for Community Solutions
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 340714723
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 2167812944
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,173,926
- Expenses
- $3,417,717
- Assets
- $33,659,323
- Liabilities
- $1,972,021
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- EMILY CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT & CEO): $198,079 total reported compensation
- EMILY MUTTILLO (DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH): $120,242 total reported compensation
- TARA BRITTON (DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC POLICY): $115,999 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The center for community solutions provides various support services to individuals and organizations throughout northeast Ohio. The organization provides strategic leadership to improve targeted health, social and economic conditions. The organization's major sources of revenues are grants from foundations, contracts with public and private entities and contributions.
What it reported doing in 2024
Core competencies: the center for community solutions provides various support services to individuals and organizations throughout northeast Ohio. Community solutions provides strategic leadership to improve targeted health, social and economic conditions. Community solutions' major sources of revenues are grants from foundations, contracts with public and private entities and contributions.in 2024, community solutions published new and original content every week through over 130 publications, and staff gave at least 29 presentations reaching an audience of over 2,500 on topics such as community health workers, poverty, and medicaid. Program service accomplishments: launch of the cuyahoga human service chamber, work on reducing health disparities, leadership in several key community initiatives, provided budget and advocacy training and built community capacity to engage in public policy processes. By providing timely, accurate information to our community's policymakers and service providers, community solutions lives up to its mission of improving health, social and economic conditions through nonpartisan research, policy analysis, communications and advocacy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 29.4%; rating input score 29; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.85; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $198K · 25 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 29/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.