The Cenegenics Education & Research Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880418085
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7029531599
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $432,323
- Expenses
- $460,648
- Assets
- $164,255
- Liabilities
- $214,684
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR BETH TRAYLOR (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
Highest reported compensation
- DR BETH TRAYLOR (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE): $24,000 total reported compensation
- CLARK DELANOIS (SECRETARY/TREASURER/TRUSTE): $24,000 total reported compensation
- ROBERT LANGER (TRUSTEE): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization synthesizes evidence-based knowledge, supporting and leveraging research to advance clinical practice and generate new knowledge. A provider of clinical strategies for healthy aging in age management medicine that utilizes the curriculum that is rigorously literature based and quality controlled and results in physician's competency and leadership. The curriculum is based on science and patient outcomes and best practices that are generated through external and internal research efforts.
What it reported doing in 2019
The training and certification program consists of both online and in person educational formats as well as on-going educational seminars such as advanced topics in age management medicine and cenegenics core curriculum. These programs are provided to physicians with an area of interest in healthly aging.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 92%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.31; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98% of revenue deployed · 92% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $424K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $24K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.