The Cathedral Foundation and Community Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382368359
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2008
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3138315000
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $521,847
- Expenses
- $211,699
- Assets
- $5,339,472
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLENN MILLER (PRESIDENT & RESIDENT AGENT)
Highest reported compensation
- THE VERY REVEREND SCOTT HUNTER (DEAN & CHAIRMAN - PART YEAR): $82,954 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the cathedral church of st. Paul by helping to address spiritual, social, and practical needs including support and care for the elderly and disabled, youth education and the arts; to help address poverty and other urbank and community challenges; and to further support the needs of the cathedral.
What it reported doing in 2024
The cathedral foundation & community services, inc. Provides support to the cathedral church of st. Paul and its connected organizations, and through them to the community on a nonprofit basis by helping to address spiritual, social, and practical needs. These needs include support and care to enhance quality of life for the elderly and disabled, for youth education, especially in the arts, and for music and arts offerings to the community. Through the receipt and administration of funds the cf & cs works with the cathedral to help address hunger, healthcare, and other urban and community challenges, and further to address cathedral needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.2%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 69.8%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 59.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.22; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.2% of revenue deployed · 69.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $148K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.