The Carl Malone Foundation Inc D/b/a Mercy's Door
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204765874
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Cleveland, TN, USA
- Phone
- 4232985631
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Foster Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $318,405
- Expenses
- $70,088
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARL MALONE (CEO/PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RANDALL MALONE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER)
- CARL MALONE (CEO/PRESIDENT)
- RICK PATTON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization operates homes in dalton, ga that serve at risk youth ages 6 to 17 who have been abused, neglected, abandoned, homeless or victimized by their parents and family.
What it reported doing in 2023
The organization operates homes in dalton, Georgia. These homes serve at risk youth ages 6 to 17 who have been abused, neglected, abandoned, homeless or victimized by their parents and family. It has received licensure with the state of Georgia including approval by state agencies such as dfcs and djj.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 80% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 41
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.1%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 78%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.1% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $64K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.