The Campbell Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951976088
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Glendale, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8182422434
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Sheltered Employment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $188,939
- Expenses
- $318,641
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY NIEBRUGGE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- NANCY NIEBRUGGE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $81,144 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides adults with developmental and intellectual disabilities the opportunity to achieve independence through residental placement, vocational training and job placement, socialization and employment.
What it reported doing in 2025
Core programs support client directed community integration and supported employment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. All programs are person centered, where a customized plan is created to tap into their unique abilities and assist them in achieving their personal goals. Through support provided by the pastimes program, clients join nondisabled peers in both online and in person activities and volunteer projects that match their interests and provide socialization and a sense of place in the broader community. Topics include exploring art and multimedia through our art academy, and learning digital literacy skills via our innovative virtual learning platform. For those seeking work, we assist with job readiness skills and placement, and provide coaching to support clients in the workplace.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -68.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $220K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.