The California 9-11 Memorial
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 834135725
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Fresno, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5594723500
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Commemorative Events
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $178,129
- Expenses
- $167,937
- Assets
- $320,205
- Liabilities
- $48,156
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RANDI CARTER (President)
- BRITTANY COOK (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JULIE LUNDHOLM (Director)
- JULIE DEBENEDETTO (Director)
- HEATHER CALANDRA (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The California 9-11 memorial in clovis, ca was created in remembrance of the 2,977 people killed on september 11, 2001. The organization's mission is to continue to educate the public about the 9/11 attacks and honor the heroes and innocent civilians who perished.
What it reported doing in 2024
The California 9-11 memorial partnered with the fresno county superintendent of schools to promote and establish the one voice event, a musical event which brings together students from local junior high and high schools, as well as community members. Students were also invited to participate in an art, poetry, and logo contest for scholarship opportunities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.6%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 62.1%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.91; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.6% of revenue deployed · 62.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $104K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.