The Building Officials Association of Palm Beach County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650183255
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
West Palm Beach, FL, USA
Phone
5612330014
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,106
Expenses
$37,283
Assets
$33,842

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • MARK CANDREVA (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JENNIFER LANG (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The building officials association of palm beach county (boapbc) is a Florida not-for-profit corporation comprised of building officials, inspectors, plans examiners, architects, engineers, contractors, industry members, and others mutually interested in the promotion and enhancement of public safety, through diligent and consistent enforcement of applicable construction codes and regulations throughout palm beach county Florida. The building officials association of palm beach county has been the local chapter of the building officials association of Florida since 1974 and the local chapter of the international code congress since 2001. Our mission is to enforce the provisions of the Florida building code, while providing education and financial support to local scholarship applicants and supporting icc & boaf with nationwide and state applicants.

What it reported doing in 2024

Charles o'meilia scholarship- the scholarship is 1000 and is automatically renewed for up to 3 additional years provided the student maintains the eligibility requirements. We raise all the scholarship funding locally, and as a result, we seek to award the funds to palm beach county students. We also donate 1000 yearly to international code council (icc) for their nationwide scholarship applicants and 500 to the building officials association of Florida (boaf) state applicants. Annual picnic-held in the spring at a palm beach county park. Sponsors & ticket sales help fund the event and raffle ticket sales allow us to donate to local high school construction based choice programs and the charles o'meilia scholarship. Fishing tournament- held in june on a fishing charter boat. Sponsors & ticket sales help fund the event and raffle ticket sales allow us to donate to local high school construction based choice programs and the charles o'meilia scholarship. Annual joint industry luncheon- held in august, typically at a city sponsored venue. The luncheon is a boapbc and industry guest funded event to discuss the next year in construction and become unified with code compliance and public safety. Golf tournament- held in september at a local palm beach county golf course. Sponsors & ticket sales help fund the event and raffle ticket sales allow us to donate to local high school construction based choice programs and the charles o'meilia scholarship. Clay shooting event- held in november at the palm beach county shooting park. Sponsors & ticket sales help fund the event and raffle ticket sales allow us to donate to local high school construction based choice programs and the charles o'meilia scholarship. Award gala- held in december at a local venue. Sponsors and ticket sales help fund the event. This is when the international code council (icc) swears in the new executive board members for the next fiscal year. Provided 2,500 dollars to local, state, and national graduates, and 6,000 to local high school choice programs studying the construction industry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 55%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -105.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 55% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.