The Brandon Foundation Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462999089
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Fort Wayne, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2603874267
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $376,894
- Expenses
- $153,006
- Assets
- $716,148
- Liabilities
- $10,592
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER KNOBLAUCH (President)
- CATY SMITH (CEO/FOUNDER)
Highest reported compensation
- CATY SMITH (CEO/FOUNDER): $51,710 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The brandon foundation is an organization where students are shown the power of their potential through individualized mentoring and family-focused support.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Brandon Foundation is a transformational youth development organization committed to unlocking the full potential of underserved children and teens in Fort Wayne. Grounded in the belief that every young person is created with purpose and promise, the Foundation equips students with the tools, support, and opportunities they need to rise above barriers and build meaningful, self-determined futures. Through a long-term, relationship-centered model, the Brandon Foundation walks alongside students from elementary school through high school graduation and beyond. Its holistic after-school and mentorship program provides academic support, leadership development, life skills training, and consistent, caring mentorship. Within a safe and empowering environment, students are challenged to grow in confidence, character, and vision-learning not only to succeed, but to lead. A defining element of the program is its commitment to educational advancement. Every graduating senior is supported with a scholarship, reinforcing the Foundation's belief in their potential and investing in their next chapter. This financial support, paired with years of mentorship and preparation, positions students to pursue higher education, vocational pathways, or career opportunities with confidence and clarity. The Brandon Foundation's impact is deeply generational. Many graduates return as staff and mentors, embodying what is possible and pouring back into the next generation. This powerful cycle of empowerment transforms not only individual lives, but families and the broader community. By combining unwavering support, high expectations, and intentional investment, the Brandon Foundation is not just shaping outcomes-it is cultivating leaders, strengthening futures, and building a legacy of generational change.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 98
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.8%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 65.2%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.2%; rating input score 91; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 59.4%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.68; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.8% of revenue deployed · 65.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $52K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.