The Boys and Girls Club of Assabet Valley Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237105393
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Maynard, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9784612871
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neighborhood Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $943,752
- Expenses
- $861,166
- Assets
- $1,855,470
- Liabilities
- $65,225
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT LAMMEY (PRESIDENT)
- ANNALISA CAMPANILE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANNALISA CAMPANILE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $184,992 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the boys & girls club of assabet valley is to promote the growth of young people in our community by empowering them to become productive, caring, responsible citizens.
What it reported doing in 2025
The boys & girls club of assabet valley has provided educational, cultural, recreational, and various other charitable activities for children ages 5 - 18 in the maynard, stow, concord, acton, and sudbury, Massachusetts area for over 40 years. The organization offers programs in the areas of after school care, summer care, vacation care, girls' programs, sports programs, and fitness services. These programs service not only the youth, but teens and adults as well. In addition, the boys & girls club of assabet valley offers facility rentals for gym space, study space, function space, and kitchen.the organization is staffed with people that are certified in cpr/first aid, has participated in epilepsy training, and has cleared mass cori and national background checks. These individuals are in charge of the operation and management of members, volunteers, and programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.4%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.15; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.4% of revenue deployed · 68.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $588K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $185K · 13 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.