The Boca Raton Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993760643
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Boca Raton, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5614473531
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,348
- Expenses
- $969
- Assets
- $105,379
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL HOSTETTLER (PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD)
- TAMARA SAVATIC (VICE PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DANIEL HOSTETTLER (PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD)
- TAMARA SAVATIC (VICE PRESIDENT / DIRECTOR)
- TAMI THRAUM (TREASURER / DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The boca raton foundation for charitable giving is an associate-driven philanthropic initiative created to strengthen south Florida communities through targeted financial support. The foundation provides grants to local charities whose programs advance food security, education, and the well-being of women and children. Built on the belief that generosity is central to the luxury experience, the foundation expands the boca raton's enduring commitment to community impact through direct, purposeful giving
What it reported doing in 2024
Hunger relief, access to nutritious meals, food distribution, community gardens, and related services. Education academic support, literacy programs, vocational and trade training, after-school enrichment, and adult learning. Safety of women and children, stability, health, mentorship, and long-term support for women, children, and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 93
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 99.1%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 108.75; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.