The Blessing Cup of Tallahassee Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843754829
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Tallahassee, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8503218566
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $123,567
- Expenses
- $44,216
- Assets
- $341,265
- Liabilities
- $36,850
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL POPP (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL POPP (PRESIDENT)
- BRENDA POPP (TREASURER)
- CURTIS DEWITT (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a safe and clean housing arrangements for elderly (60 years or older) people that live at or below the proverty income line and are unable to provide housing for themselves due to insufficient funds or ones that would qualify for subsudized housing from governmental agencies. The goal is to help reduce homelessness in elderly members of the community by providing housing. Financial assistance is also provided to the poor elderly individuals in the community for medical, nutritional and housing needs to help alleviate their plight.
What it reported doing in 2025
To provide a safe and clean home environment for 6 elderly people that live at or below the proverty level and unable to provide housing for themselves.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 34.7%; rating input score 35
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.2%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.72; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 34.7% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.