The Bismillah Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933567230
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Altamonte Springs, FL, USA
Phone
7864325464
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$119,711
Expenses
$95,173
Assets
$34,971
Liabilities
$6,624

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VJOLCA CAPRI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CLAUDINE RICHARD (PRESIDENT)
  • AUDREY CEDANO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • VJOLCA CAPRI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CLAUDINE RICHARD (PRESIDENT)
  • AUDREY CEDANO (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The bismillah institute provides low cost or free mental health services to all central Florida residents age 12 and up.

What it reported doing in 2025

Teen mental health: provided approximately 347 hours of service to 67 teenagers with pediatrics aged 12-17 who are underinsured or uninsured. Forensics (evaluations for those individuals who experience trafficking, domestic abuse, or are seeking asylum)

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.6%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 38.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 160.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.6% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.