The Biomimicry Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861153859
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bozeman, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4158001401
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Biological & Life Sciences
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,948,697
- Expenses
- $3,249,497
- Assets
- $2,450,360
- Liabilities
- $158,782
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENT SNYDER (PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA STURGEON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- AMANDA STURGEON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $237,975 total reported compensation
- MEGAN DWYER (ASKNATURE BRAND MARKETING DIRECTOR): $118,701 total reported compensation
- BETH RATTNER (DIRECTOR SYSTEMS CHANGE, FORMER): $115,061 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purposes of this corporation shall be to naturalize biomimicry in the culture by promoting the transfer of ideas, designs, and strategies from biology to sustainable human systems design. About biomimicry: efforts to address climate change, consumption, pollution, deforestation, and the myriad of other issues that threaten the planet have to date been primarily reactive and wholly insufficient. The strategies we relied on to provide food, water, energy, shelter and comfort to a growing population are now seen as compounding rather than solving the problems. Biomimicry is a new science that studies nature's best ideas, abstracts the deep design principles, and then emulates these designs and processes to solve human problems. The biomimicry institute is the foremost authority and all around go-to place for biomimicry information, through its four main programs: biomimicry design challenges & education programs, innovation program, systems change program, and asknature.
What it reported doing in 2024
Asknature - asknature and asknature hiveas the largest open-access database for innovators to find biological models for design guidance, asknature is mission-critical for our work. Students use asknature when they first learn design and engineering skills in various biomimicry programs and continue to use it as they advance through university and become innovators. Our aim is to have nature-inspired design become standard practice, with asknature as a primary tool.we currently have more than 1,775 articles describing biological strategies (a characteristic, mechanism, or process that performs a function for an organism or other type of living system), 310 describing innovations (stories behind realized and conceptual products, services, and system components that are inspired by biology), 75 indexed resources specifically designed for educators, and 40 feature pages featuring curated subsets of our content and contextualizing intros or essays. Asknature is the world's go-to and largest open-access source of biomimicry education resources for primary, secondary, post-secondary, and professional audiences. In 2024 we improved functionality and added or updated dozens of pages of content to this service.in 2024, we had approximately 636,000 engaged users on the site who accessed free resources and content (in 2023 we reported 712,000 total visitors, but changes in google analytics led to the new description and a lower number this year). Overall they generated 3.2m views. Our users come from a wide variety of sectors including education, architecture, design, engineering, biotechnology, environment, land use, health, transportation, energy, fashion, government, non-profits, and media.the us is our largest audience, but 75% of our traffic is international, coming from 229 countries. This is up from 63% in 2023, and we believe it is driven by the soft-launch of ai generated translations of all our pages into multiple languages, namely spanish, french, german, and portuguese. We hope to work out some technical issues around the way the translator works with our search functionality, and then to promote the translation option more prominently.to increase our ability to create new pages quickly and efficiently, we continued developing and using ai tools to aid in the translation of information from scientific papers into accessible asknature pages. We also continued development of a public-facing ai tool that will allow users to enter their questions in a chat-style interface and receive scientifically accurate information in easy-to-understand language, framed within asknature's editorial and ethical guidelines, and contextualized for each user's particular challenges and area of activity.we also continued producing content specifically for instagram, translating biological strategies into blueprint-like overlays on top of beautiful nature photos. We produced 29 of these images, generating thousands of new likes and receiving roughly double the average number of likes per post for our account. This was fewer images than in 2023 because of diversion of resources towards launching our asknature hive online community platform.we continued to produce our monthly newsletter through most of the year, but then sunset it as we launched the asknature hive online community platform and began to communicate with our followers that way. We also continued writing and recording 24 roughly 1-minute audio stories about biological strategies in nature for the wonderspace podcast from the panahpur foundation. In the second half of the year we began in earnest the creation of the asknature hive online community platform. This is part of our new ten-year strategy, and groundwork that will support other future efforts including an online learning platform and offline convenings.we chose to build the hive on the kajabi platform because of its low cost and robust learning module options. We launched with a series of monthly live conversations with promine
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 70.9%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 81.6%; rating input score 82; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.7%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.8% of revenue deployed · 70.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $238K · 13 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 34 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.