The Bergen-passaic Arc Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223458399
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hackensack, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2013430322
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,738
- Expenses
- $62,142
- Assets
- $2,617,097
- Liabilities
- $28,087
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHY WALSH (SECRETARY/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHY WALSH (SECRETARY/CEO): $160,343 total reported compensation
- LISA VALAS (TREASURER/DIR FINANCE): $129,481 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The administration of a foundation the general objective of which is the promotion and advancement of the health, education, recreation and general welfare of developmentally disabled individuals and the receipt, administration and investment of funds, gifts, and devises that shall be made to the corporation and the disbursement of the principal and or income there of for the promotion and advancement of the health, education, recreation and general welfare of developmentally disabled.
What it reported doing in 2024
To support the programs and services of the arc of bergen and passaic counties through assistance with fundraising activities. The foundation, through its board and fundraising consultant spearhead fundraising initiatives and campaigns to raise funds to benefit the arc of bergen and passaic counties. Funds raised, often go directly to the arc of bergen and passaic counties rather than first to the foundation to be then granted to the arc of bergen and passaic counties. This year was the continuation of the project to raise funds for the renovation of a kitchen in an arc residential program and to support other arc programs and direct mail campaigns to assist with the operation of the programs and services of the arc of bergen and passaic counties.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -250.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 42.11; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $160K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.