The Beautiful Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
721517535
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
New Orleans, LA, USA
Phone
5043196825
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,661
Expenses
$69,981
Assets
$48,473
Liabilities
$55,360

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUBIANTE BROWN (President)
  • JOSEPHINE VANDERHORST (Vice President)
  • FELICIA DEXTER (President)

People named in this filing

  • LAUREN M PERRY (Executive Dir.)
  • RUBIANTE BROWN (President)
  • JOSEPHINE VANDERHORST (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The beautiful foundation provides a safe environment for the leadership development of underserved young women by focusing on self-esteem, entrepreneurial thinking, and their emotional, physical, and mental well-being.

What it reported doing in 2020

The foundation provides in school, after school and summer programs dedicated to empowering middle and high school girls by engaging them in lessons that focus on: self-esteem, confidence building, healthy relationships and friendships, trust, identity, peer pressure, physical, nutritional, and mental health, entrepreneurship, financial literacy, etiquette, hygiene, dreams and goals, gifts and talents, college readiness, act prep and much more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 53.3%; rating input score 53

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.14; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 53.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.