The Obama Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464950751
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Chicago, IL, US
Phone
1-(773)-900-0044
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$209,759,915
Expenses
$91,442,238
Assets
$1,106,193,451
Liabilities
$34,917,742

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VALERIE JARRETT (DIRECTOR/CEO)
  • JOHN KEVIN POORMAN (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • VALERIE JARRETT (DIRECTOR/CEO): $755,862 total reported compensation
  • ROBBIN COHEN (EVP, OPC): $650,749 total reported compensation
  • ALFREDA BRADLEY-COAR (EVP, CHIEF LEGAL & PEOPLE OFFICER): $440,192 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire, empower, and connect people to change their world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Obama foundation programming: in service of the foundation's mission to inspire, empower, and connect people to change their world, the foundation continued to work with young leaders in a variety of local, national, and global programs.scholars: our scholars program supports leaders around the world who are ready to take their work to the next level via a one-year residential program that brings together academic, skills-based, and hands-on learning. For the 2023-2024 school year, the scholars program included 18 scholars at the university of chicago and 12 scholars at columbia university.leaders: leaders africa, asia-pacific, europe, and USA are each leadership programs aimed at building and empowering regional networks of changemakers. The regional cohorts participate in values-based leadership training. The leaders africa program began in 2018, the leaders asia-pacific program launched in 2019, the leaders europe program launched in 2020, and the leaders USA program launched in 2022. The africa, asia-pacific, and europe cohorts each contain 35 members, and the USA cohort contains 100.the voyager scholarship: the obama-chesky scholarship for public service, launched in 2022 with the selection of 100 students to receive scholarships. Each year, 100 new students are selected to receive scholarships and participate in the two-year program. The voyager scholarship is designed to build the next generation of leaders committed to public service through a transformational combination of barrier-reducing financial aid and meaningful, educational travel experiences.the obama leadership network ('oln'): oln connects all foundation leadership programs alumni to each other, to increase their individual and collective impact and help them sustain themselves as lifelong values-based leaders. The foundation supports this network through a variety of virtual and in-person activities to foster connection, continued development, community, and collaboration. By the end of 2024, oln grew to include 1,209 leaders in nearly 150 countries across 20 cohorts of obama leaders, scholars, fellows and voyagers.girls opportunity alliance: the girls opportunity alliance seeks to empower adolescent girls around the world through education, allowing them to achieve their full potential and transform their families, communities, and countries. The program engages people around the world to take action to help adolescent girls and the grassroots leaders working to educate them.my brother's keeper alliance: the mbk alliance leads a national call to action focused on building safe and supportive communities for boys and young men of color where they feel valued and have clear pathways to opportunity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.8%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 55.9%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.1; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 7 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 28.8% of revenue deployed · 55.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $51.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $756K · 32 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $197.8M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.