The Baltusrol Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273467707
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Springfield, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9733761900
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $138,868
- Expenses
- $41,750
- Assets
- $187,175
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHUCK FOWLER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHUCK FOWLER (PRESIDENT)
- DAN REGAN (SECRETARY)
- NEALE TRANGUCCI (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The baltusrol foundation, inc. Was establshed to extend charitable aid in the form of financial assistance to current, former, and future employees of baltusrol golf club (the "club") and their families and dependents as well as independent contractors and vednors of the club. This charitable aid is intended to relieve economic hardship and financial crises suffered by the baltusrol beneficiaries arising from death, injury, illness, abuse, accident, natural disaster, or other personal or family emergency. In addition, the foundation provides such individuals, through an application process, with educational assistance. The foundation, from time to time, will also provides support to local area irc section 501(c)(3) organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, the baltusrol foundation, inc. Provided charitable assistance, in the amount of $32,338, to eligible beneficiaries to relieve economic hardship and financial crisis arising from death, injury, illness, abuse, accident, natural disaster, or other personal or familiy emergencies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.1%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.9%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.48; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $42K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.