The B2b Project Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 844546567
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Mclean, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7035499938
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Leadership Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,750
- Expenses
- $16,205
- Assets
- $39,104
- Liabilities
- $34,557
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JANE-SCOTT CANTUS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
People named in this filing
- PAMELA A DREW (DIRECTOR)
- JANE-SCOTT CANTUS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- JULIE BOWEN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation acts as a supporting organization to the b2b project by conducting activities that improve the effectiveness of exceptional "board-ready" executives who support diversity of thought, perspective, and experience through educational peer advisory forums, educational programming, and expanding opportunities for board service.
What it reported doing in 2024
As a 501(a)(9) supporting organization, the b2b project foundation funds specific education programs produced by the b2b project through grants. Expenditures incurred by the b2b project foundation are primarily associated with fundraising and administration of advisory committee (national leadership council).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -332.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -118.6% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -37.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.