Teaching Artists Guild
Legal name: The Association of Teaching Artists Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141808163
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5015909896
- Rating
- 30
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $685
- Expenses
- $77,256
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary Katherine Rainey (Co-Executive Director)
- Kai Fierle-Hedrick (Board President)
People named in this filing
- Mary Katherine Rainey (Co-Executive Director)
- Heleya De Barros (Board Treasurer)
- Kai Fierle-Hedrick (Board President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are the voice of the teaching artist, communicating the depth and breadth of work that teaching artists provide our educational systems and communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
As a community-led organization, TAG is an organization with a sociocratic, shared-power model. Currently, the day-to-day operations are run by two Co-Executive Directors. However, the majority of our programming is made through our National Advisory Committee (NAC). "The National Advisory Committee (NAC) is a working group that collaborates with the Co-Executive Directors on the strategic direction and mission of the organization. NAC members are expected to act as ambassadors for the field and the organization in a variety of networks and events. They have an interest in supporting the professionalization of the field for teaching artists and uniting teaching artists nationally and internationally. Members of the NAC are asked to join at least one working committee, which meets via video conference monthly (or as determined by committee). The time commitment for each committee membership is 6-8 hours per quarter. Starting in 2022, term limits for active NAC members are 3 years. After a member's term ends, they can remain on the NAC as an Emeritus member, participating in quarterly meetings but not required to sit on a subcommittee. Historically, the NAC has been co-chaired by two members. Moving forward in 2022, the NAC will have four Co-Chairs who each lead one of the NAC's sub-committees (Advocacy & Outreach, Communications, Finance, and Knowledge). The four NAC Co-Chairs also make up the Operations Committee in partnership with the Co-Executive Directors and help make decisions about the day to day operations of the organization. Key Responsibilities include: Lead one sub-committee, including scheduling meetings, managing members, taking minutes, and reporting back to the NAC at quarterly meetings; Sit on the operations committee and meet monthly with the Co-Executive Directors; Act as thought leaders and decision makers with the Co-Executive Directors on the day to day operations of the organization; and Co-chairs must commit to this position for at least one fiscal year, with the opportunity to continue afterwards. Our website also includes the Pay Rate Calculator; TAG Asset Map, which acts as a roster for teaching artists to find hiring organizations and vice versa; job board; resource databases for curriculums, social justice tools, advocacy initiatives, and regional networks for teaching artists to connect with; professional development listings; event listings; and articles written by and for teaching artists and our national conference ""Our Shared Future"" this past April 2022." During the pandemic, TAG, alongside partners across the country, developed "Listening Tours" (a facilitated open conversation to gather information, insight, values, context, and new ideas from teaching artists) in several localities and communities across the nation. The goal was to center teaching artists and further the field. By bringing teaching artists of local communities to the table, hiring organizations can understand the nuances of their values, how they define their assets, and what they identify as their challenges and needs. Learning all this allows the collective of teaching artist associations to deepen their support of and advocacy for the field. From these tours, TAG and partners co-created a "break up letter" to arts organizations across the country in order to better advocate for teaching artists' needs, especially in this new post-pandemic landscape. Membership is free for teaching artists across the states to sign up and create a profile.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 1
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11,178.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -42.1% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.