The Association for Vascular Access Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205631901
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Mount Royal, NJ, USA
Phone
8779242821
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,816
Expenses
$23,382
Assets
$207,111
Liabilities
$20,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michelle L Hawes DNP CRNI (President)

People named in this filing

  • Michelle L Hawes DNP CRNI (President)
  • Mark Hunter MS BScN RN (Pres. Elect)
  • Amy Bardin-Spencer EdD MSc (Pres. Advisor)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The AVA Foundation is a public charity focused on education and research support to help save lives through risk-free vascular access. The foundation promotes evidence-based clinical practice and serves clinicians, students and vascular access patients and their families.

What it reported doing in 2024

The AVA Foundation provides grants for primary research to collect the data and evidence for best practices in vascular access care. By helping to develop evidence-based protocols, the AVA Foundation seeks to effectively improve patient outcomes by providing funds to healthcare practitioners to pursue higher education so they may deliver the highest level of vascular access care. Travel award scholarships are available to clinicians to attend the Association for Vascular Access (AVA) Annual Scientific Meeting. This meeting promotes hands-on involvement and education. The AVA Foundation also supports educational projects that promote quality vascular access care to patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -57.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.86; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 52.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.