The Arts Alliance LLC
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465761427
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Marshall, TX, USA
- Rating
- 47
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,679
- Expenses
- $7,203
- Assets
- $43,750
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gayle F Ewing-Keys (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Gayle F Ewing-Keys (Executive Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To bring art and entertainment into underserved communities. In so doing The Arts Alliance LLC. TAA has The Art For Charity Gallery that makes art accessible to communities. In addition the production and education of Juneteenth as a national holiday using the anthem JUNE. By using the song as a focal point TAA is able TAA help educate the community about the history of Juneteenth. TAA also has Room For Love which provides living necessities and art supplies to victims of fire and natural disasters to help relieve stress during a crisis.
What it reported doing in 2025
TAA celebrated Juneteenth 2025 at the Wiley University Welcome Center in Marshall TX. TAA showed the film Juneteenth History by Dwight DeCee Cornish. Guest speaker Angel Fitzpatrick Superintendant of Karnack ISD and gave out BOSS Awards to two community members who work diligently to support the arts. Refreshments were served.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 16
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 30%; rating input score 30
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 76.5%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.07; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -75.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 51% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 41.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 7% of revenue deployed · 30% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.