The Arc of Mecklenburg County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
560662725
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Charlotte, NC, USA
Phone
7043324535
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,475
Expenses
$143,481
Assets
$77,890
Liabilities
$5,126

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Taryn George Fenner (Vice President)
  • Rich Barker (Past President)
  • Heather Nodeland (President)

People named in this filing

  • Taryn George Fenner (Vice President)
  • Amanda Nagley (Director)
  • Andrew Spafford (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Arc Of Mecklenburg County Serves Individuals With Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities And Their Families By Identifying Needs, Developing Programs And Providing Resources, To Promote And Support Independent And Productive Citizens Within Our Community.

What it reported doing in 2017

The Arc Of Mecklenburg County Serves Individuals With Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities And Their Families By Identifying Needs, Developing Programs And Providing Resources, To Promote And Support Independent And Productive Citizens Within Our Community.Awareness & Education: Continued to provide assistance to individuals in the community needing connections to services and support.FASD: Continued to work with Mecklenburg County ABC Board to raise awareness of FASD through billboard advertising & community events.Aktion: Continued to operate 5 local Aktion club chapters in the area partnering with Kiwanis and providing monthly get togethers and service projects for individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities.Operation Santa: Provided Christmas gifts to several hundred individuals with developmental disabilities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.1%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -71.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.1% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.