The Arc Cumberland County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510189422
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Crossville, TN, USA
Phone
9314560206
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,152
Expenses
$53,706
Assets
$178,014
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GLENDA BOND (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • NORA DAVIS (CO-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GLENDA BOND (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • NORA DAVIS (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • GRANT THURMAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The entity's primary exempt purpose is to promote the well being of persons with i/dd.

What it reported doing in 2025

Part iii. Line 30the social & recreation programs including year-round integrated team sports for 30 people age 4 and up, using special adaptive equipment & supported by 10-15 volunteers each week; annual gym or field special event for 100 people aged 18 months-85 years, supported by 200+ volunteers; each participant gets awards, t-shirts & refreshments. Food is provided for the annual dance/prom for 300 people age 14 and up. Spring & fall dance instruction & 2 on-stage performances for 15 people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.8%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 62.2%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.8% of revenue deployed · 62.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.