The Annie Tinker Association for Women Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 136405671
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2012
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2122605580
- Rating
- 18
- Verdict
- AVOID
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $182,785
- Expenses
- $242,591
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Women's Rights
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. The foundation's positive operating resources came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The foundation combined direct charitable work with grants to other organizations or people.
- Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.
The verdict
AVOID - The strongest available result is that the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify all grant recipients and a relatively small share of spending goes to grants.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 39
- Transparency: 0
- Compliance: 50
- Endowment Health: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 39.1%; rating input score 39; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Scored; rating input score 0
Compliance
- Foundation activity disclosures: Limited
- Filing consistency checks: 4; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Investments: Filed investments detail
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency: Grant recipient disclosure scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 39/100.