The Andrew Jackson Police Youth Camp Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621443335
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6158312464
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $642,680
- Expenses
- $529,687
- Assets
- $1,803,467
- Liabilities
- $30,681
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOEL COTTRILL (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOEL COTTRILL (PRESIDENT): $24,000 total reported compensation
- ANDREW GREGA (BOARD MEMBER): $12,000 total reported compensation
- ALLEN HERALD (CAMP DIRECTOR): $12,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The andrew jackson police youth camp, inc. Builds community involvement with nashville's underprivileged youth in a safe environment by operating a summer youth camp in metropolitian nashville and davidson county, Tennessee.
What it reported doing in 2024
The andrew jackson police youth camp, inc. Operates a summer camp for underprivileged youth in metropolitan nashville and davidson county, Tennessee. Campers are also chosen for the "shop with a cop" program, allowing the children an opportunity to shop for christmas gifts with a police officer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 45%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 51%; rating input score 51
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.4; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 45% of revenue deployed · 51% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $270K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $24K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.