American Islamic Forum for Democracy
Legal name: The American Islamic Forum for Democracy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 710940051
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-T 2020
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022541840
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Peace and Security
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,638
- Expenses
- $50,989
- Assets
- $18,783
- Liabilities
- $6,473
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- M ZUHDI JASSER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SORAYA DEEN (DIRECTOR)
- ARIF HUMAYUN (DIRECTOR)
- M ZUHDI JASSER (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
AIFD advances reform within the house of Islam and fights the ideology of Islamism, emphasizing liberty and freedom. To achieve our mission we need your help, together we can lead the conversation and movement > TAKE ACTION We need your financial support to continue confronting the ideologies of political Islam. To achieve our mission we need your help: it is only together that we can push for frank and honest conversations about universal human rights, religious liberty, and the need for reform within the Muslim community. []( Group 2 Group 4 Sign up for our newsletter.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our public engagement program continued to grow steadily with a significant boost from our leadership in the clarity coalition to "save the west". This included hundreds local and national media appearances, publications, events, and public forums as well as a heavy programming emphasis on social media engagement, and other platforms. In 2024, aifd also continued to participate in many events virtual and across the united states and internationally including forums debating islam's compatibility with democracy at oxford, and other forums on the spread of islamist groups like the muslim brotherhood (mb) and the need to designate the mb a terror organization. Aifd also participated in forms and discussions on religious freedom, islamism, middle east policy, counter- radicalization, human rights, minority rights, muslim radicalization, the "red-green axis", u.s. Government security and foreign policy engagement, law enforcement, military officer education, and veterans' affairs to name a few. Aifd organized programs via webinars with large attendance in real-time and in subsequent viewership covering areas of antisemitism, the red- green axis, integration, the threat of islamism, human rights, women's rights, minority rights, and free speech to name a few. Our public debates against islamists also exemplify our mission of reform and the reality of ideological diversity within american muslim communities. The need for aifd's work continues to grow exponentially with global challenges related to islamist radicalization and the spread of jihadist ideologies growing exponentially especially with the synergy and cooperation of the extreme left (marxists, communists, socialists) with the islamists-the marxist-jihadist networks. Additionally, the instability in regions most notably in gaza, lebanon, iran, iraq, syria, afghanistan, pakistan and other muslim majority nations, in addition to mass anti-immigration demonstrations in europe has continued to solidify aifd's public role and reputation as a subject matter expert on the root causes and impact of islamism. Aifd continues to be sought after by public policy experts, governments, human rights organizations, and universities, as well as domestic and foreign community networks for its expertise and testimony in national security, religious freedom, political islam, islamist terrorism and associated domestic and foreign policy. Aifd has also nurtured and built strong partnerships with non-muslim, interfaith organizations in the national security, counter-jihad, and religious freedom space most notably helping co-found, co-lead and foster the growth of the diverse and broadly based clarity coalition (champions for liberty against the reality of islamist tyranny). Aifd's office has also continued to respond to hundreds of phone calls, emails, and postings from people across the country with networking across the world on behalf of aifd and the coalition of the muslim reform movement and clarity coalition.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -78%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.