The American Friends of the Nationalmuseum of Sweden Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821501817
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2128883361
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,250
Expenses
$5,625
Assets
$99,648

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAVID ER DANGOOR (CHAIRMAN)
  • ANDERS HOLST (TREASURER)
  • BARBARA WENNERHOIM (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purposes of the foundation are to foster and support the understanding and appreciation of art and design and the cultural heritage of sweden.

What it reported doing in 2025

The foundation raises and grants funds to support programs and projects of the swedish nationalmuseum, sweden's premier art and design museum. It supports research, education, publications, lectures, discussions, and courses with respect to art and design. The foundation also promotes and fosters greater understanding of swedish and international art, design, history, and culture through education, exhibitions, publications, discussions, research, and dialogue among educators, artists, and the general public, both in the united states and worldwide. It helps to ensure greater public access to and appreciation of art and design, and conducts or supports other charitable and educational projects and activities consistent with its primary exempt purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -32.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.72; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 40.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.