The American Center for the Alexander Technique Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 136171846
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9176087776
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,520
- Expenses
- $69,426
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- N Brooke Lieb (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- N Brooke Lieb (Vice President)
- Anastasia Pridlides (Director)
- Karen Krueger (Pres, Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides member services for its members who teach self-awareness skills of easeful body alignment and movement. Before the process of dissolving the corporation began, the organization's exempt purposes also included the training of teachers in this technique as well as providing the general public with opportunities to learn about this technique.
What it reported doing in 2021
FYE 2021 activities involved carrying out the approved plan of dissolution. This included:-Safely transferring all historical documents to Juilliard for archive.-Copyright transfer of founders Judith Leibowitz, Deborah Caplan and PearlAusubel historical documents to the Juilliard School.-Disbursing restricted funds to approved recipient organizations with missions and activities consistent with intended uses of those restricted funds.-Transferring curriculum and website to FourWinds Academy.-Completing all administrative activities necessary for operations until dissolution is final.-Submitting documentation to the New York State Attorney Generals Office and Department of Taxation and Finance seeking the required approvals for dissolution.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -19.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.