The Amazing Care Charitable Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842890428
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Phone
5108475870
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
In-Home Assistance

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,184
Expenses
$67,799
Assets
$473,117
Liabilities
$500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cora Tellez (President, Dir)

People named in this filing

  • Cora Tellez (President, Dir)
  • Geoff Galbraith (Director)
  • Duarte Batista (Secretary, Dir)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The program will provide educational materials and resources regarding caregiving and aging to individuals who cannot afford these services. Our organization will focus on assisting people in the aging process, as well as family members/friends who take care of the elderly.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our accomplishments in 2024 included: a. Provided support to financially distressed seniors by way of paying for home care servicesb. Paid for adult day health services for financially distressed seniors with dementiac. Supported the Youth Caregiver Program designed to help young people who are charged with care-giving support for elderly/disabled members of their familyd. Supported nonprofit organizations providing comfort and care to terminally ill patients and their families

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.4%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51.6%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.98; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -11.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.4% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $65K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.