Amal Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820618872
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6175433985
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$514,970
Expenses
$447,692
Assets
$236,739
Liabilities
$1,256

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE DE LA FUENTE (FOUNDER/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANIELLE DE LA FUENTE (FOUNDER/CEO): $68,077 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide displaced and disenfranchised children worldwide with social development programs that help them cope with the invisible scars of trauma and the learning fundamentals necessary to succeed.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, amal alliance remained steadfast in its mission to provide displaced and underserved children with social-emotional learning (sel) and quality education, ensuring they have the necessary tools to heal, grow, and thrive. As global displacement continues to rise, our work has never been more critical. This year, we focused on expanding access to education through mobile learning, scaling sel programs in both formal and informal settings, and leveraging technology to reach children in crisis situations worldwide. A major highlight of the year was the launch of our mobile learning initiative, an innovative approach to bringing education directly to migrant and displaced children living in remote shelters across Massachusetts. In partnership with the Massachusetts governor's executive office of education, the department of early education and care, horizons for homeless children, and neighborhood villages, we transformed mobile buses into trauma-informed learning spaces. This initiative ensured that even the most transient children had access to quality early education and emotional support, bridging gaps in their developmental and academic journey. At the same time, we continued to scale colors of kindness, our flagship sel program, expanding its reach in both greece and the united states. In greece, we worked alongside the greek ministry of education and religious affairs to integrate colors of kindness into the national curriculum via the skills lab platform, making it accessible to thousands of students in public schools. Meanwhile, in the united states, we introduced colors of kindness at the rafael hernndez dual language magnet school in boston, adapting the program for bilingual learners in collaboration with baobabooks, an ai-supported literacy platform. This expansion follows years of successful piloting across multiple countries and underscores our commitment to tailoring sel approaches to diverse educational contexts. Internationally, our flying colors program in uganda showcased the power of blending sel with digital learning tools to support displaced children. In partnership with hopelink for all foundation (haf-uganda) and learning equality, flying colors provided out-of-school and at-risk learners in palabek refugee settlement with structured sel and academic support. By integrating the colors of kindness curriculum with kolibri, an offline- first digital platform, we helped children develop emotional resilience, regain foundational academic skills, and prepare for reintegration into formal education. Initial results demonstrated remarkable improvements in emotional regulation, engagement, and literacy/numeracy scores, proving the effectiveness of this blended education model for crisis-affected communities. In 2025, we reached 6,980 new primary-aged students over more than 349 new classrooms. An additional 672 early learners through the mobile learning initiative. 9 training and workshops were conducted to train dozens of teachers and volunteers. As we look ahead, we remain committed to scaling innovative learning solutions, forging strategic partnerships, and ensuring that every child- regardless of circumstance-has access to education that nurtures both their mind and heart.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 63.5%; rating input score 63
  • Fundraising efficiency: $75.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.1%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 63.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $284K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.