The Alta Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922889372
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Pateros, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4258708069
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $403,717
- Expenses
- $392,141
- Assets
- $97,364
- Liabilities
- $287
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- James L Romack Jr (Executive Dir.): $53,040 total reported compensation
- Tanya Romack (Managing Dir.): $52,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Alta Project is dedicated to addressing the fundamental challenges faced by the Turkana and Maasai tribes, including access to clean water, providing access to feminine hygiene products, nutritious meals, and investing in banking collectives and small business training for women.
What it reported doing in 2025
Comprehensive Support to Milimatutu Girls Senior Secondary SchoolProvided comprehensive support to students and staff at Milimatutu Girls Senior Secondary School. When third-term school fees did not arrive with returning students, the school faced closure; Alta covered wages for support staff - drivers, cooks, security, secretarial, and non-certified classroom aides - and provided food security for the boarding students, allowing the school to remain open. The students completed the school year. Approximately 500 students benefited directly from these services. Based on average family size in the region, the educational, nutritional, and economic benefits of the program extended to an estimated 3,000 family members.Alta staffed and stocked an on-site medical clinic throughout the year, keeping girls healthy and recovering quickly with little lost class time and without the cost and distance of seeking care in Lodwar, and provided conseling alongside visiting specialist teams and the school's ongoing on-site work. Hygiene and sanitation support included 1,000 dignity kits for students and staff, a soap making program in which the girls produced their own soap to keep themselves, their uniforms, and the school clean year-round, and basis supplies such as toilet paper, toothbrushes, and toothpaste.Alta scholarshipped four girls for ICT training in Nairobi, who continue their studies at Milimatutu and Lodwar; sustained an on-campus ICT track in which earlier graduates now teach computer skills to current students; and established the application process and administrative infrastructure for a girls' scholarship program launching in 2026. The organization strengthened the campus through infrastructure improvements, ICT equipment, and the beginning of Starlink satellite connectivity for digital and online learning. With the students, Alta planted 1,500 trees and supported tutoring by the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) in afforestation and agriculture, and facility film-based awareness programming, including screenings of NAWI.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 51
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.8%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $327K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.