The Alpha Gamma Rho Educational Foundation of Alpha Gamma Rho
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 631178179
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Montgomery, AL, USA
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,217
- Expenses
- $10,394
- Assets
- $224,629
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Scott Slocumb (President)
- Merle Flowers (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Scott Slocumb (President)
- Paul Pinyan (Secretary Treasurer)
- Merle Flowers (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For charitable religious education and scientific purposes including for such purposes the making of distribution to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under the section 501 c3 of the internal revenue code 1954 or correspondent provisions of any future US internal revenue law: to receive money or property by gift devise or bequest and to hold manage sell invest and reinvest use operate devote and expend such money or property and proceeds and the income thereof for the study experimentation research and advancement of agriculture forestry biological sciences and other professions or areas of endeavor related thereto: To aid assist needy and deserving students in their efforts to secure and education by scholarships loans and grants: To promote and encourage scientific philosophic and literary endeavor.
What it reported doing in 2025
3.0 Award Dinners
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 69%; rating input score 69
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.61; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -47.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 69% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.