The Alliance for Employee Growth and Development Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222764717
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Red Bank, NJ, USA
Phone
7325131186
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$4,014
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY JO REILLY (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SUSAN MCDERMOTT (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHEN MUSCAT (TRUSTEE)
  • DIANE BRADLEY (TRUSTEE)
  • TOM RUNNION (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The alliance stakeholders share a vision that the growth and development of the individual is the key to success in a competitive, worldwide marketplace. The alliance was born out of this shared vision to serve as a resource to individual employees who want to take charge of managing change in their lives.

What it reported doing in 2020

Education, training and personal development services for active and displaced union-represented employees of at&t corp., nokia of americas corporation (formerly alcatel-lucent), avaya inc., frontier communications, and optical fiber solutions. The board of trustees approved a certificate of dissolution of the alliance for employee growth and development, inc. And a plan of complete dissolution and liquidation on june 5, 2019 with the alliance to be dissolved effective as of september 30, 2019. Liquidation plans continued during the current fiscal year with the alliance making distributions to its members as reported on schedule n. Complete liquidation of the organization is expected by june 1, 2021.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -18.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.