The Alfred E Mann Foundation for Scientific Research

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954002032
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Phone
6617026700
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
General Science

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$257,887,615
Expenses
$72,682,511
Assets
$567,896,814
Liabilities
$12,714,596

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT GREENBERG (CEO/PRESIDENT/CHAIR OF THE BOARD)
  • JOHN RIVERA (VICE PRESIDENT, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT)
  • SHAWN LEWIS (VICE PRESIDENT, HUMAN RESOURCES)
  • BRIAN MECH (VICE PRESIDENT, STRATEGY)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT GREENBERG (CEO/PRESIDENT/CHAIR OF THE BOARD): $1,831,312 total reported compensation
  • FARAH BOROOMAND (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/TREASURER): $739,815 total reported compensation
  • COREY DISHMON (CHIEF BUSINESS AND LEGAL OFFICER): $630,851 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The alfred e. Mann foundation for scientific research (amf) dba humannity medtec (hmt) is a medical research organization dedicated to developing and commercializing innovative solutions for significant unmet medical conditions.

What it reported doing in 2025

New project developmentthis program covers (a) the monitoring and evaluation of several early stage advanced research and development efforts underway that are directed at developing - innovative technologies, project ideas and concepts before they progress to the status of full-fledged development programs, and (b) ongoing efforts related to the advancement of commercial development and protection of intellectual property of these projects across the development lifecycle. The team comprises the full range of expertise available at amf/hmt, including executive management, research scientists and engineers, legal and intellectual property experts, business development strategists and analysts.expenses may include ongoing participation in the development effort, including research and development support, collaboration management, conference and professional society meeting attendance, service in management or on the board of directors of spinout entities, patent prosecution and the prosecution of infringement actions to protect the value of the intellectual property we create. In addition to payroll expenses and direct expenses paid to outside vendors for goods and services related to projects, expenses in this program may include travel expenses, patent prosecution expenses and fees, legal fees for expenses to create, preserve and protect intellectual property from infringement and remedy past infringement, and incentive and other compensation payments to employees and others related to these programs and actions. In some cases, certain of these expenditures might be incurred long after the programs have been launched into spinout companies or licensed to third parties.revenues associated with these projects (some of which may accrue long after the project and any related program have been outlicensed or launched into a spinout company) may include: recoveries of judgments or settlements from patent infringement and licensing matters, royalties on licensed product sales, milestone payments, ongoing contract r&d services provided to partners, licensees and spinout companies, interest, and proceeds from liquidity events (e.g., initial public offerings, acquisitions) involving retained equity interests in projects that have been spun out as startup companies.status: design and development activities are underway for a new bioelectronic program based on existing business case analyses. These activities include generation of initial system requirements, assembly of a team of key opinion leaders with domain expertise, and the initiation of some fundamental applied research in the area of novel stimulation techniques, including completion of pre-clinical testing. Additionally, the business development team, along with executive management and other staff, performed preliminary due diligence on a number of projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 54
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.9%; rating input score 30
  • Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 71.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.81; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.9% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $66.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.8M · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $13.1M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.