The Al Barry Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263503443
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Columbia, SC, USA
Phone
8037367536
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$50
Expenses
$100
Assets
$358
Liabilities
$1,679

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Elizabeth L Taylor-Barry (President/Secr)
  • E Lance Vetter (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Elizabeth L Taylor-Barry (President/Secr)
  • E Lance Vetter (Vice President)
  • Verarose Muir (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Formed in memory of Lt. Col. A. P. Barry, USMC, Ret., the Foundation has been established to research, design, develop, coordinate the manufacture of speciality apparel, sell and gift apparel and health care products in the care of wounded warriors who are active duty or retired military and cancer patients. These patients may be in military medical facilities, home health care programs or hospice care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -100%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.58; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.69; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -32.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -28.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.