The Actors Studio of New Jersey
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933894041
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Verona, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9737475829
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,725
- Expenses
- $4,275
- Assets
- $873
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Restaino (Chief Executive Officer)
People named in this filing
- Michael Restaino (Chief Executive Officer)
- Lauren Noack (Secretary)
- Dan Sims (Director of Vision)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Actors Studio of New Jersey (ASNJ) is proud to reflect on its accomplishments as a nonprofit theater company dedicated to producing professional mainstage theater and making theatrical experiences accessible to the greater New Jersey community. In 2024, ASNJ delivered three outstanding performances, each exemplifying our commitment to artistic excellence and community engagement. Through our productions, we strive to create an inclusive environment where individuals from diverse backgrounds can experience the transformative power of storytelling. Our programming reflects a balance of innovation and tradition, ensuring that our productions resonate with audiences while fostering cultural enrichment. As part of our mission, we prioritize accessibility by offering affordable ticket options and creating welcoming spaces for all patrons.
What it reported doing in 2024
American Idiot Live Performance Musical Attendance: 87 persons
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 66% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 6 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.