The Accomplis Collective Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852503070
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9173972907
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,874,990
- Expenses
- $2,539,119
- Assets
- $523,213
- Liabilities
- $8,299
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLY BECK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KELLY BECK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CANDACE CHRISTIANSEN (SECRETARY)
- AMY JONES (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Accomplis Collective operates as a non-profit entity in New York. The Organization's mission is to heal Native and Black communities from the legacy of economic and environmental injustice through restorative capital deployment and cultural reclamation. Accomplis is committed to building a just economy by removing barriers to capital, by serving as a bridge builder between diverse partners, and by acting as an advocate for transformative change. Funding categories fall across broad categories of land, water, homes and bodies.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Organization engages in grantmaking through three funds: the Fund for Black Lives (FBL), the Peoples Fund (TPF), and the Radical Healing Fund (RHF). FBL supports Black-led organizations working on food security, housing stability, community building, and cultural reclamation. TPF provides catalytic capital to people and projects in Native communities working on water security, food sovereignty, birth work, and cultural reclamation. RHF supports care for the bodies, hearts, and minds of movement frontliners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.6%; rating input score 96; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 40.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 23 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.