The Academy of Senior Health Sciences Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272502045
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6144611922
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $325,786
- Expenses
- $395,518
- Assets
- $2,111,288
- Liabilities
- $1,396
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS MURRAY (CEO)
- ROGER KING (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS MURRAY (CEO): $189,700 total reported compensation
- ROGER KING (PRESIDENT): $124,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the academy of senior health sciences is to promote and advocate for issues that improve the quality of life of individuals receiving facility-based long-term care services and supports and improve the well-being of the staff and businesses that provide those services. The academy of senior health sciences strives to be the leader in developing innovative business strategies and public policies that create a quality driven facility-based long-term services and support industry to the benefit of both recipients and providers.
What it reported doing in 2025
The academy provides public education and awareness initiatives to the long-term care community in Ohio. Its membership represents a true cross- section of the skilled nursing facility profession, from small sole proprietorships to larger Ohio-based multi-facility companies, as well as those businesses that service our industry. Through the academy's public education and awareness efforts, the academy brings the collective influences of the members together into a single voice on vital issues affecting the long-term care profession.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.1%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 71.2%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.34; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.1% of revenue deployed · 71.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $282K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $190K · 4 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.