The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231352000
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2152991000
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Physical & Earth Sciences,

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,774,400
Expenses
$23,780,439
Assets
$110,211,618
Liabilities
$4,132,495

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

43 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT COOPER PHD (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN A FRY (BOARD TRUSTEE (TO 9/24)): $1,880,879 total reported compensation
  • HELEN BOWMAN (BOARD TRUSTEE (AS OF 3/25)): $863,727 total reported compensation
  • SCOTT COOPER PHD (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $724,855 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing and building a movement of environmentally engaged communities for a healthy, sustainable and equitable planet.

What it reported doing in 2024

Public education - the academy brings natural science to life through three floors of engaging permanent exhibits that include our historic dioramas and dinosaur hall, as well as the children's nature discovery center, outside in, that facilitates hands-on experiences with live animals. While visitation to the academy is still rebounding from the effects of the global covid-19 pandemic, we welcomed more than 126,000 visitors in the fiscal year 2025. This past summer, the number of group visits for summer camps continued to increase, and attendees of the academy's popular summer science camp rose significantly. The academy continues to offer exciting new experiences to the public. In 2025, the academy presented the first-ever co-created exhibition with drexel's westphal college. The exhibition featured stunning and provocative garments from drexel's robert and penny fox historic costume collection alongside specimens from the academy of natural sciences and works by contemporary changemakers. Together, the exhibition boldly explored how materials, production processes, and our own patterns of clothing consumption impact the world around us. In our spotlight gallery, we presented three new exhibitions highlighting the role of community science in advancing our understanding of the natural world, including heirloom plants, neighborhood naturalists, and living within the watershed, which helped catalyze the opening of the watershed, a new climate resilience hub in germantown in partnership with mural arts philadelphia and the philadelphia water department. In our special exhibitions gallery, we presented ice dinosaurs, an exhibition based on groundbreaking discoveries surrounding dinosaurs that lived in extreme polar environments. Public programming, including the academy town square series, dinos after dark, and festivals such as the beloved bug fest and confluence film festival, now in its second year, animated the public experience. In fiscal year 2025, we also continued to collaborate with drexel faculty on the museum innovation fund, a micro-granting opportunity that inspires faculty and students to experiment with the academy as a space for new approaches to public engagement.the community learning division continues to create community-centered initiatives that mobilize environmental justice leaders and civically minded individuals. Partnering with communities across the city, the academy provides science-infused curriculum to schools and educators, supports professional development within a network of educators, and creates environmental justice programs for students. The department of community science works in partnership with drexel's environmental collaboratory to identify and deliver funded projects in which individuals and communities partner with scientists to answer and address real-world environmental questions. Drawing on the academy's unique attributes - including its scientists, collections, and relationship with drexel, the education, learning and development (eld) department creates programs and curricula in support of lifelong learning. Eld has been providing focused stem lessons for 2nd and 3rd grade students at the friends select school for more than 10 years. The academy's center for steam equity works in partnership with drexel (in particular, the school of education) to address social inequity through steam teaching and learning by conducting, catalyzing and supporting community-based research. Among these efforts, the nationally recognized and award-winning women in natural sciences (wins) program, the longest-running of its kind in the region, continues to deliver after-school and summer enrichment for young women, introducing hundreds of high school students to future careers in science. Our most recent addition to the program supports wins students as they navigate their years in higher education. Wins iii follows the students as they transition from high school to college, offering mentorship, skil

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 93
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.5%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 69.9%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.3%; rating input score 99; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.63; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.5% of revenue deployed · 69.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 26 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 43 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
  • Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.