The 405 Center Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813386349
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4056061616
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,633
- Expenses
- $61,118
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUSTIN COFFEE (PRESIDENT & EXEC DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- COURTNEY COFFEE (PARTNERSHIPS DIRECTOR)
- MATT HANGEN (DIRECTOR)
- GRANT HUMPHREYS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The 405 center is all about connecting the people of our city together, for the good of the needs of the people in our city. The 405 center aims to be the place where people convene, get trained and equipped, and then are released out to serve in a way that counts.
What it reported doing in 2021
The 405 center connects those who can give help with those who need help in our city, primarily the vulnerable, marginalized, and those who are homeless. The 405 center provides training to volunteers who are working with the people who are marginalized and in need in the Oklahoma city area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -52% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -142.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2020 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.