The 3Up3down Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820639759
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Patterson, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8454020022
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $96,445
- Expenses
- $12,106
- Assets
- $215,719
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FREDRIC STOCKFIELD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN PAUL CUNNINGHAM (DIRECTOR)
- DARYL DREYER (DIRECTOR)
- ZACK GRAZCYK (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The 3 up 3 down organization is a non-profit, 501(c)(3), designed to promote, foster and support the game of baseball to youth and others within our community. The organization through its members and stewards shall support the promotion, facilitation and education of the game. The organization is also determined to help support individuals with developmental disabilities, individuals that may not have the ability to participate or enjoy this game quite as readily or as easily as their typical peers. It is our hope and desire to give back to the baseball community and help towns, leagues, and other organizations continue spreading the game. As adults that have enjoyed this great game for so many years, we believe it's a privilege to play this game. In doing so, we believe it's even more important to also give back to the surrounding community were we play.
What it reported doing in 2024
To support and promote youth baseball while also supporting individuals with developmental disabilties.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 64% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.3%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 87.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.82; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -33.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.