The 1 Collective Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850883364
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Milton, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4042906691
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Sexual Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,811
- Expenses
- $46,244
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREN HEARD (CEO)
People named in this filing
- KAREN HEARD (CEO)
- ALEXANDRIA WILLIAMS (SECRETARY)
- LESLIE TURVILLE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a collection of donors passionate about, and committed to, disrupting the chains of human trafficking. Our model is to partner with those already in the trenches fighting to rescue, recover and rebuild the lives of human slaves.
What it reported doing in 2024
The 1 collective has two main areas of focus. Our largest project, project cambodia sponsors 30 children to attend private school. Sponsorships are provided by individual donors on a re-occurring monthly basis. The $80 monthly donation covers all school tuition, uniforms and books, and provides a bag of rice for the family of each child. In north africa we partner with beauty for ashes to provide funds for 2 transition homes for girls who have been rescued from human trafficking or are considered at risk. 12 girls are now living in one home; the second home was opened in 2023. The majority of funds raised for beauty for ashes are raised on an "as needed" basis for a specific need (ie. More housing, food, education needs). Other nonspecific donations given to these projects are given immediately and directly to the organizations to be used at their discretion.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 55.2%; rating input score 55
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.1%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -46.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 55.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.