Tg 302 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742939665
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2108214300
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $614,007
- Expenses
- $519,986
- Assets
- $1,738,155
- Liabilities
- $425,393
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACLYN S WOODRING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JACLYN S WOODRING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $352,294 total reported compensation
- JAMES BUTCHER (MANAGEMENT AGENT CFO): $204,078 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization was incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in the state of Texas on january 24, 2000. The mission of the organization is to preserve affordable housing for families, to promote a strong resident community, and to assist residents to achieve economic independence.the primary activity of the organization is the ownership and operation of the harrison manor apartments, a 50-unit apartment complex located at 601 south 17th street, harlingen, Texas 78415 for the benefit of very low-income families and individuals. The organization maintains a u. S. Department of housing and urban development (hud) property based section 8 housing assistance payment (hap) rental assistance contract for all 50 units. The hap rent assisted units are made available to families and individuals with incomes of less than 30% of area median income.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization sustained the hud property based section 8 hap contract and continued to make all 50 units available for low-income families and individuals. The organization maintained property operations in compliance with the regulations of hud.the following tax exemptions continued to be received: internal revenue service 501(c)(3) income tax exemption, cameron county, Texas, appraisal district 100% property tax exemption, state of Texas franchise tax exemption, state of Texas sales tax exemption.the organization continued to operate an on-site hud certified neighborhood networks center at which the organization provided programs, activities, and services for the youth and adult residents and surrounding community. Programs, activities, and services included: case management (informal) and referral services after-school youth programon-line computer access and trainingadult learning opportunitiesarts & crafts financial/budgeting classes and nutrition classesnational night out and holiday celebrationsnational affordable housing management association (nahma) drug free poster art contest
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 56
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.34; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $478K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $352K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 68 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.