T.F.T. Organization
Legal name: Tft Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474179249
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Fort Worth, Texas, US
- Phone
- 682-301-1109
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,257
- Expenses
- $43,176
- Assets
- $132,806
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Broderick Taylor (President)
People named in this filing
- Broderick Taylor (President)
- Jason Lorch (Chief Financial Officer)
- Angela Ma (Chief Operating Officer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our Mission is to help families, Individuals, and youth by giving them Financial Education that will help them get out of debt and build generational wealth for their Families.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Young World Changers Program educates youth aged 10-18 on financial literacy budgeting saving and responsible credit use. Participants partake in community projects promoting civic responsibility career readiness workshops covering resumes interviews and job exploration and character-building activities fostering leadership integrity and resilience. The program also focuses on preventing drug alcohol and crime involvement and promoting healthy life choices. Scholarships are awarded to aid participants in pursuing higher education goals. In 2025 the program served approximately 300 youth in various Fort Worth communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 60% for direct work, and 40% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 37.4%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 61.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 37.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.