Texoma Aco Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454368900
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Wichita Falls, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9403975128
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Domestic Fraternal Societies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,191
- Expenses
- $2,637
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR VINAYAK RADKAR (President)
- DR WILLIAM ROBISON (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- DR VINAYAK RADKAR (President)
- DR WILLIAM ROBISON (Vice President)
- DR GARY OZIER (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Texoma aco, llc is a qualified accountable care organization as created under the medicare shared savings program for the purpose of providing quality, cost efficient health care services to the public from selected health care providers while seeking to improve the quality and consistency of those medical services. It strives to improve the quality of the health care while doing so in a way that costs the us government less in medicare disbursements. Its services benefit the government and the public.
What it reported doing in 2018
As an accountable care organization (aco), texoma aco, llc creates incentives for health care providers to work together to treat an individual patient across care settings including doctors' offices, hospitals, and long-term care facilities. The medicare shared savings program rewards aco's that lower the health care costs while meeting performance standards on quality of care. Texoma aco, llc accepted responsibility for 5,522 medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in order to participate in the medicare shared savings program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -121.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.